To correct some XHTML 1.0 Transitional Compliance issues as I find them

In includes/nukeSEO_SB.php find around line 88 this snippet

Code: if ($imgsize == "text") {          $bookmarkHTML .= "$sitename";       } else {          $bookmarkHTML .= "<img border=\"0\" src=\"$siteimg\" title=\"$imgalt\" alt=\"$imgalt\">";       }

chang to

Code: if ($imgsize == "text") {          $bookmarkHTML .= "$sitename";       } else {          $bookmarkHTML .= "<img border=\"0\" src=\"$siteimg\" title=\"$imgalt\" alt=\"$imgalt\" />";       }

In case you missed it, we have simply closed the image tag.
I should add that this is not a bug fix as it isnt a bug per se, more of an enhancement if you are running Raven Nuke which is mostly XHTML compliant.

Thanks... I'll add this to the download. I'm also reviewing the top social bookmarking sites to see which sites should be included.
_________________

You must have read my mind lol.
I was just reviewing the top 10 social bookmark sites with the highest PR.

Based purely on Alexa ranking:

1. http://myweb2.search.yahoo.com/ PageRank: 7/10 | Alexa: 1
2. http://www.digg.com/ PageRank: 8/10 | Alexa: 80
3. http://del.icio.us/ PageRank: 8/10 | Alexa: 159
4. http://www.netscape.com/ PageRank: 9/10 | Alexa: 504
5. http://reddit.com/ PageRank: 8/10 | Alexa: 882
6. http://www.fark.com/ PageRank: 8/10 Alexa: 1,223
7. http://www.43things.com PageRank: 7/10 | Alexa: 1,706
8. http://www.mister-wong.de/ PageRank: 6/10 | Alexa: 2,141
9. http://www.furl.net/ PageRank: 7/10 | Alexa: 3,166
10. http://www.blinklist.com/ PageRank: 6/10 | Alexa: 3,516
11. http://www.newsvine.com/ PageRank: 7/10 Alexa: 3,681
12. http://www.blogmarks.net/ PageRank: 7/10 | Alexa: 6,016
13. http://ma.gnolia.com/ PageRank: 7/10 | Alexa: 7,117
14. http://www.shoutwire.com PageRank: 6/10 | Alexa: 10,105
15. http://www.simpy.com/ PageRank: 7/10 | Alexa: 10,262
16. http://www.spurl.net/ PageRank: 7/10 | Alexa: 11,531
17. http://bluedot.us/ PageRank: 6/10 | Alexa: 12,259
18. http://www.blinkbits.com/ PageRank: 6/10 Alexa: 15,104
19. http://www.bumpzee.com/ PageRank: 0/10 Alexa: 15,327
20. http://netvouz.com/ PageRank: 7/10 | Alexa: 18,760
21. http://wink.com/ PageRank: 3/10 | Alexa: 22,231
22. http://www.trailfire.com/ PageRank: 5/10 | Alexa: 22,278
23. http://www.shadows.com/ PageRank: 6/10 | Alexa: 22,666
24. http://www.backflip.com/ PageRank: 6/10 | Alexa: 26,605
25. http://www.feedmelinks.com PageRank: 6/10 | Alexa: 38,851
26. http://linkagogo.com/ PageRank: 7/10 | Alexa: 45,299
27. http://de.lirio.us/ PageRank: 6/10 | Alexa: 52,009
28. http://www.blogmemes.net/ PageRank: 5/10 | Alexa: 56,592

uuugghhh... everyone is getting into it. The usual stages of:

innovation --> success --> copy success --> eventual overflooding of the market --> mass confusion --> start of massive consolidation --> eventual 3 - 4 recognized "winners".

Or, is this really going to be different this time...

I've haven't really checked them all out, but from what I have seen, they're trying to go after different target markets. For example, mister-wong.de claims to be Europe's largest social bookmarking site (bookmarking only allowed in German), while netvouz supports English and Swedish. Yahoo and Netscape rank high based on their other efforts. I think many want to be acquired, but seeing that Digg and del.icio.us dominate the pure-play social bookmarking sites, I don't see a Google or Microsoft (the only remaining non-players) acquiring a wink or de.lirio.us...

Alexa ranking is a reasonable guide to how many 'hits' a site gets and sometimes this can affect a page rank using on the basis that hits=popularity, though that concept is flawed as 'hits' can be from things other than 'visitors'. For a useful tool for taking advantage of the hits=popularity part of an SE algorithm search for Alexa Booster

Just thought I would throw that in.
I'm really looking forward to this next release of nukeSEO. As an experiment, I stopped using it a few months ago and my PR fell from 4 to 3 so I'm looking forward to reversing this result, if nothing else, it should to prove to doubters the real world advantages of nukeSEO

Guardian, another possible thing to consider, though, is the breadth of your content. I could have sworn that I heard Steph talking about that long ago that the most important thing is relevant content. I am NOT saying your site and its content is not relevant, so, please no-one make that "leap". I am just saying that if there is too much general content going on, which your site has grown considerably in the last 6 months, it just makes me wonder if that is what Steph was hinting at.

But, as you know, I am certainly no SEO guru (far from it). Just trying to "connect the dots" and I may have just created a snowman when the true intent of the dots was a porshe.

You are perfectly correct.
Content is King but relevant content is a whole new continent.

My content is much broader than it originally was and certainly much broader than I'd like but find 'fresh' content within the narrow confines I had originally set was proving tiresome.
It is time to lose some of it though - like the music vids!