CKEditor

webmaster Joined: Nov 28, 2007 Posts: 38

Have you had a chance to look at the new CKEditor?

Site Admin Joined: May 12, 2005 Posts: 876

Yes, but not in detail. It looks faster, more functional...
_________________

Posted: Thu Jul 09, 2009 10:08 pm Post subject:

It seems much faster!

For anyone that wants a look.
http://nightly.ckeditor.com/3842/_samples/skins.html

Feature list for 3.0 & 3.1
http://dev.fckeditor.net/wiki/v3_status

Posted: Sat Jul 11, 2009 2:30 am Post subject:

Looks nice and that Kama skin would almost match the RavenIce theme, hmmm.....
_________________
Only registered users can see links on this board! Get registered or login!

webmaster Joined: Dec 26, 2005 Posts: 254

Yeah, played around a little bit with their demo. Really like it. Sure wish they could have included the "Full Page" editing into 3.0. That one would make me want to wait on 3.1.
_________________
Only registered users can see links on this board! Get registered or login!
Only registered users can see links on this board! Get registered or login!

Posted: Sat Aug 29, 2009 7:55 am Post subject:

Wanted to add that the CKEditor was released on the 24th.

http://ckeditor.com/

Posted: Sat Aug 29, 2009 9:36 am Post subject:

What do you think about nukeWYSIWYG 3.0 including ckeditor and HTML Purifier?

Posted: Sat Aug 29, 2009 9:43 am Post subject:

I think HTML Purifier is PHP 5.x so that might restrict the consumer base *slightly* but I would definitely use it and sounds like a good idea!

Posted: Sat Aug 29, 2009 9:51 am Post subject:

It could check the PHP version and use kses if not 5...or have a configuration parameter that lets the webmaster decide which to use.

Having said that, I haven't reviewed the usage of HTMLpurifier yet, so implementing it might require additional changes to the nukeWYSIWYG functions (though doubtful).

Posted: Sat Aug 29, 2009 10:11 am Post subject:

I'll be blunt lol. I feel sorry for people still running PHP 4, but in my opinion its there lose. Upgrade/move hosts or be left behind.

Posted: Sat Aug 29, 2009 4:24 pm Post subject:

"yes" on ckeditor for sure. But I think HTML Purifier and Technocrat's phpInputValidator tools need a more thorough review. I suppose if HTML Purifier's sole purpose is to protect against XSS (which was kses' primary purpose), then one could tie the two together. (I still struggle with the whole notion of tieing a site admin's hands by filtering his/her input vs. protecting against CSRF/XSS attacks, but I'm torn with how to balance the risk/reward.)

I think there needs to be more business logic around filtering though, such as things like: do we have true numeric, do we have a valid formatted email address, do we have ______ fill in the blank. Goes way beyond kses and certainly wouldn't be appropriate for nukeW.

Posted: Sat Aug 29, 2009 7:33 pm Post subject:

We are getting a little off topic here, but I am pretty sold on HTML Purifier. I'm not sure about phpInputValidator either, but I think HTML Purifier is the gold standard in my opinion.

Posted: Sat Aug 29, 2009 8:39 pm Post subject:

Agreed!

webmaster Joined: Jun 12, 2006 Posts: 23

Purifier would hopefully allow for syntax highlighting plugin to function. That would be great.

Newbie Joined: Jul 09, 2007 Posts: 3

is this topic totaly dead !
hey mates ckeditor is a great version of FCK...
is there any chance of porting it ?!
or it may up to us

Welcome to nukeSEO.com !	Home News Stories Archive Forums Forums Unanswered Posts Modules Content Downloads Encyclopedia FAQ Feeds Tutorials Web Links Your Account Login Register Site Info Sitemap